balancing traditional and contemporary ideals

The region has been the subject of a contentious discussion over” Asian values” as a result of Asian countries ‘ economic successes, which are frequently achieved using quite different methods than those of the West. The alleged universality of Eastern economic models, political ideals, and social practices, as well as the responsibility of cultural factors in East Asia’s emergence as an intercontinental power, have been the main topics of discussion in this debate.

One invariable reply to these criticisms has been an East Asians ‘ incensed belligerence. The characterizations of their societies that have emerged in the process are certainly flattering: they are said to be self- reliant, yet apparently communitarian, centered on specific relationships and shared obligation rather than frosty letter vietnamese girl for marriage of the law – even though the latter is called upon to enforce those values, respectful of hierarchy and authority, and state interventionist, maybe into the private space of individuals.

This defensiveness is a natural reaction to the fact that the affected societies are experiencing an unprecedented level of change as a result of globalization forces. The heart of this discussion is, however, the way in which these societies are trying to create norms of governance and social organization that will be viewed as legitimate by their citizens.

This is happening at the local level, in public forums, in local government, and in their local social and religious institutions. According to my informal poll of respondents in 1994 and 1996, the emphasis that the majority of Asians place on maintaining an organized society even at the expense of some individual freedoms is a good idea.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *